We use cookies and other tracking technologies to provide services in line with the preferences you reveal while browsing the Website to show personalize content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audience is coming from in order to improve your browsing experience on our Website. By continuing to browse this Website, you consent to the use of these cookies. If you wish to object such processing, please read the instructions described in our Cookie Policy / Privacy Policy.
Interested in blogging for timesofindia.com? We will be happy to have you on board as a blogger, if you have the knack for writing. Just drop in a mail at toiblogs@timesinternet.in with a brief bio and we will get in touch with you.
Matt Symonds is Chief Editor of BlueSKy Thinking, and co-Founder of some of the most popular business school and university platforms of the last 25 years. He was the S of QS LESS … MORE
The story of higher education in Asia over the last ten years has been dominated by China, both for the growing presence of the country’s leading institutions on the world stage, the impact and reach of Chinese university research, and student flows that have been affected by the pandemic.
Chinese universities now fill 8 of the top 30 places in the BlueSky Thinking Ranking of University Rankings 2022/23 – Asia & Oceania, which is the first league table to combine the annual results of the four global university rankings compiled by THE, QS, US News and ARWU Shanghai.
Tsinghua University now ranks #1 in the region, compared to its position at #3 five years ago. It is followed by Peking University at #2, which has risen three places since 2017/18. Their continued rise has pushed the University of Melbourne of the top spot, with the University of Tokyo sliding three places down to #5.
Other Chinese universities have also made significant advances in the Asia & Oceania rankings, with Huazhong Univ of Science and Technology climbing 12 places to make the top 30. Other winners include Zhejiang University (+9), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (+7), and Nanjing University (+6). Fudan University (+1) and UST China (+1) also contributed to the collective surge.
Institutions in Hong Kong have also risen in the rankings over the past 5 years, with Hong Kong Polytechnic University leading the way with a 10-place improvement, followed by University of Hong Kong (+3) and Chinese University of Hong Kong (+1). Only HKUST slumped, sliding 8 places to #26.
The two leading institutions in Singapore have consolidated their position among the Asian elite, with National University of Singapore unchanged at #4 and Nanyang Technological University rising 3 places to #6.
The other rankings performance of note across the four major global rankings is the first university from the Arabian Peninsula of Southwest Asia to make the region’s top 30 – King Abdulaziz University. Founded in 1967, the public university in Jeddah welcomed over 177,000 students in 2022. It ranks #84 in the global BlueSky Ranking of University Rankings, and when compared to other schools in Asia and Oceania it has climbed 13 places to #21 from five years before.
After many years bossing the regional league tables, universities in Australia have slipped slightly. However, a country with a population of 25.7 million boasts an impressive tally of 8 universities in the top 30, with the University of Melbourne, University of Sydney, University of Queensland and Monash University in the top 10 since 2017/18.
The BlueSky Thinking Ranking of University Rankings aggregates the performance of schools across the four major global rankings. Each of them uses a different methodology and measures different things with the inherent limitations of each assessment, so doing particularly well in one ranking and less well in another is reflected in the overall average score.
Despite that broader balance, the advances made by universities in China and Hong Kong have largely been at the expense of institutions in Japan and South Korea. Osaka University saw the biggest drop of any school that was in the top 30 five years ago, falling 10 places down to #35. Kyoto University’s positions in the regional rankings has also declined, down 7 places to #17 while Tohoku University lost 6 places to #33. Even the mighty have been humbled, with University of Tokyo down to #5.
The rankings picture is not much brighter in South Korea, though Yonsei University did make the top 30 with a jump of 8 places. Elsewhere, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology tumbled 5 places to #28, and the prestigious Seoul National University feel from #14 to #18.
Where will things stand 5 or 10 years from now? The last three years of a global health crisis and the impact of China’s Zero Covid policy will no doubt have an impact on rankings whose methodologies include measures of international outlook and collaboration.
And what about India? Phil Baty at Times Higher Education has fascinating insight on how the geopolitics of knowledge is shifting. Draft regulation from the country’s University Grants Commission (UGC) may open up the system and see leading international universities set up campuses in India.
“In recent years, India’s visibility in the THE World University Rankings has exploded, with the numbers of universities meeting the high standards to be ranked more than doubling since 2016,” he explains. “But places for India at the very top of the rankings have remained elusive.”
“This move, and the wider bold and ambitious programme of Narendra Modi’s National Education Policy reforms could really start to change that and see Indian universities live-up to their great heritage of global intellectual leadership.”
There are winners and losers in every ranking, and all of the institutions in the top 30 are leading lights for research, academic reputation and learning across Asia and Oceania. You can find the full results on the BlueSky Thinking website.
Don’t forget to check out results for the rest of the world:
Global Top 100: BlueSky Thinking Ranking of University Rankings 2022/23 – Global
Europe Top 50: BlueSky Thinking Ranking of University Rankings 2022/23 – Europe
University Rankings Methodologies
Each of the major university rankings uses a different methodology and weights the use of different data to produce their league tables, so it is important to understand what is being measured. In simple terms:
THE – the performance indicators are grouped into five areas: Teaching (the learning environment); Research (
Teaching (30%); Research (30%)
QS– six indicators looking at four broad categories: research reputation, the learning and teaching environment, research impact, and internationalisation.
Academic Reputation (40%); Employer Reputation (10%); Citations per Faculty (20%); Faculty Student Ratio (20%); International Student Ratio (5%); International Faculty Ratio (5%)
ARWU – considers every university that has any Nobel Laureates, Fields Medalists, Highly Cited Researchers, or papers published in Nature or Science. In addition, universities with a significant amount of papers indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCIE) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) are also included.
Quality of Education (10%); Quality of Faculty (40%); Research Output (40%) Per Capita Performance (10%)
US News – calculates the rankings using 13 indicators and weights that U.S. News chose to measure global research performance.
Global Research Reputation (12.5%); Regional Research Reputation (12.5%); Publications (10%); Books (2.5%); Conferences (2.5%), Normalized Citation Impact (10%); Total Citations (7.5%); Number Of Publications Among 10% Most Cited (12.5%); Percentage Of Total Publications Among 10% Most Cited (10%); International Collaboration – Relative To Country (5%); International Collaboration (5%); Number Of Highly Cited Papers Among Top 1% Most Cited In Respective Field (5%); Percentage Of Total Publications Among Top 1% Most Highly Cited Papers (5%)
{{C_D}}
{{{short}}} {{#more}} {{{long}}}… Read More {{/more}}
Views expressed above are the author’s own.
High growth … but do more: India’s humming economy isn’t yet helping much of its low-income citizens, who need the education deficit bridged and policies that promote job-creation
It’s really basic: VP’s right on judiciary’s overreach but SC’s basic structure doctrine must stay, it’s good for robust democracy
Finally, end notes: SC right in saying policies like demonetisation are executive preserve. But dissenting judge makes good points too
Why does justice wear sahib’s robes? British Raj trappings, originally meant to cow down Indians and signal imperial superiority, make our courtrooms intimidating for ordinary people seeking redressal
History writing: Scholars stepping in where professionals fear to tread
The guvs are off: Governors in some opposition-ruled states are keeping bills pending for long, violating constitutional spirit
Haldwani’s lesson: Abrupt eviction is no answer to encroachment
Old poison scheme: GoI must build a consensus against old pension system
Mixed benches, please: Women, SCs, STs, OBCs & minorities are hugely underrepresented in higher judiciary. Correct this
Remove Raj from Raj Bhawans: Governors are necessary. But as recent controversies like those in Tamil Nadu demonstrate, they must be made accountable to not just the Union but the state and Rajya Sabha as well
Interested in blogging for timesofindia.com? We will be happy to have you on board as a blogger, if you have the knack for writing. Just drop in a mail at toiblogs@timesinternet.in with a brief bio and we will get in touch with you.
Cash Flow
Ruminations,TOI News,Tracking Indian Communities
Red Herring
Heartchakra
Copyright © 2023 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service
